Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Gass v. U.S. Department of EEOC et al
as 3:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Semaria Gass
Defendant:
U.S. Department of EEOC, U.S. Federal Court System, Mecklenburg County Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
ALLEN v. TALLEY et al
as 1:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
JENNIFER TALLEY, RENEE WARD, MEGAN M. GARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
PETERSON v. ALDRIDGE et al
as 1:2021cv00263
Plaintiff:
MAURICE PETERSON
Defendant:
STANLEY COUNTY SHERRIF DEPT., A. L. ALDRIDGE and ALBEMARLE POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Keller et al
as 5:2018cv00062
Plaintiff:
Floyd Junior Powell
Defendant:
Tony Keller, Jorge Sosa, Jason Coy Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MOBLEY v. ESTES et al
as 1:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
JASON DARNELL MOBLEY
Defendant:
B. D. ESTES, T. D. BROWN and GREENSBORO CITY POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Clinton Police Dept. et al
as 7:2014cv00248
Plaintiff:
Derick Demetrice Simmons
Defendant:
Clinton Police Dept., Unknown Police Officer and City of Clinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDANIEL v. MEISTER et al
as 1:2013cv00952
Plaintiff:
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL
Defendant:
EMILY JEFFORDS MEISTER, JAMES M. WEBB, JAMES S. PFAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
El-Bey et al v. Matthews et al
as 5:2012cv00184
Plaintiff:
Asaru Alim Tu'pak El-Bey and Khadirah Ma'At Tu'pak El-Bey
Defendant:
J. Matthews and City of Fayetteville Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
