Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Brown v. Columbia, The City of et al
as 3:2015cv04421
Plaintiff:
Eula Brown
Defendant:
Columbia, The City of, City of Columbia Police Department, Randy Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Sara Weiss
as 15-2075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery, THE MCANGUS, GOUDELOCK & COURIE LAW FIRM, in its corporate capacity for damages and for qui tam recovery, JOHN ANDREW DELANEY, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brown et al v. Columbia, The City of et al
as 3:2014cv04674
Plaintiff:
Eula Brown
Defendant:
Columbia, The City of , City of Columbia Police Department , Randy Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Jean Toal
as 13-1524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH
Defendant - Appellee:
JEAN TOAL, as administratice head of all SC's state courts and all their subordinates who intend to injure Plaintiff, all solely officially and solely for injunctive relief, DANIEL EDWARD SHEAROUSE, as Clerk of SC's Supreme Court and all their subordinates who intend to injure Plaintiff, all solely officially and solely for injunctive relief, MARK KEEL, as Chief of SC's State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) and all their subordinates who intend to injure Plaintiff, all solely officially and solely for injunctive relief and others
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Jean Toal
as 13-1489
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH
Defendant - Appellee:
JEAN TOAL, as administratice head of all SC's state courts and all their subordinates who intend to injure Plaintiff, all solely officially and solely for injunctive relief, DANIEL EDWARD SHEAROUSE, as Clerk of SC's Supreme Court and all their subordinates who intend to injure Plaintiff, all solely officially and solely for injunctive relief, MARK KEEL, as Chief of SC's State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) and all their subordinates who intend to injure Plaintiff, all solely officially and solely for injunctive relief and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. South Carolina, State of
as 13-1034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD MPH for herself and qui tam and Ex Rel the Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt (Egypt) and as founder and first member of Doctors Against Drunk Drivers (DADD); Orthodox Christians Against Executions (OCAE); Sojourners
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, all solely officially and solely for injunctive and qui tam relief, NIMRATA HALEY, as SC's Governor; all solely officially and solely for injunctive and qui tam relief, ALAN WILSON, as SC's Attorney General; all solely officially and solely for injunctive and qui tam relief and others
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Jean Toal
as 12-2326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH
Defendant - Appellee:
JEAN TOAL, as administratice head of all SC's state courts and all their subordinates who intend to injure Plaintiff, all solely officially and solely for injunctive relief, DANIEL EDWARD SHEAROUSE, as Clerk of SC's Supreme Court and all their subordinates who intend to injure Plaintiff, all solely officially and solely for injunctive relief, MARK KEEL, as Chief of SC's State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) and all their subordinates who intend to injure Plaintiff, all solely officially and solely for injunctive relief and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
