Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Kirschmann et al v. State Of Virginia et al
as 2:2018cv00600
Defendant:
Safiya Reynolds, Interim Justice Jane Marum Roush, Gail Heath Davidson and others
Plaintiff:
L.D.K., minor brought by next friend and parent, Rhonda Kirschmann and Rhonda Kirschmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lamberson v. Wytheville Police Department et al
as 7:2018cv00534
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors of Wythe County, Virginia, Gerald E. Mabe, II, Scot S. Farthing and others
Plaintiff:
David Allen Lamberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lamberson v. Wytheville Police Department et al
as 3:2018cv00677
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors of Wythe County, Virginia, Gerald E. Mabe, II, Scot S. Farthing and others
Plaintiff:
David Allen Lamberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Andrews v. Taylor et al
as 3:2017cv00533
Plaintiff:
Frederick J. Andrews
Defendant:
Victor L. Taylor, L. White, Rhonda Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
