Cases 91 - 100 of 1,587
Barnette v. Cassidy
as 5:2023hc02167
Petitioner:
John Thomas Barnette
Respondent:
David Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vick v. Town of Elizabethtown et al
as 5:2023ct03184
Plaintiff:
Nazeer Dijon Vick
Defendant:
Town of Elizabethtown, Bladen County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff James McVicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brunson v. Herring
as 5:2023hc02152
Petitioner:
Jonathan Eugene Brunson
Respondent:
John Herring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stacks v. USA
as 3:2023cv00334
Petitioner:
John Stacks
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Meyers v. Alexander Correctional Institute Wardens et al
as 5:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
John Does, FNU Byrd, Billy Bob Thorton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
QUEEN v. CITY OF GREENSBORO et al
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
DARNELL QUEEN
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENSBORO, JOHN DOE I, II, III & IV, FORMER A.D.A. MAURY HUBBARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. [FNU] CO. DANFORD
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
KAYIE SHAUNE WRIGHT
Defendant:
[FNU] CO. DANFORD, JOHN DOE, [FNU] ATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Daniels et al
as 5:2023ct03172
Plaintiff:
Camell D. White
Defendant:
Captain John Daniels and Warden John Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. JOHN DOE 1-4
as 1:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Dalveccio T. Thomas
Defendant:
John Doe 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bird v. USA
as 1:2023cv00141
Petitioner:
John Douglas Bird, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
