Cases 151 - 160 of 134,669
Page v. Chidester et al
as 7:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Goldie Page
Defendant:
Chairman Richard Chidester, Sheriff Michael Worrell, Treasurer Jonathan Sweet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bethea v. Malins et al
as 7:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bethea
Defendant:
Dr. Malins and Wallens Ridge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 7:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Marcus Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Jones, FNU Firmburn, FNU Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cooper v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, Mickduff and Mark Andersham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. USA
as 3:2024cv00400
Petitioner:
Mesuron Taylor
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Dennis v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02099
Petitioner:
Antwain Lamar Dennis
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rozelle v. USA
as 3:2024cv00508
Petitioner:
Michael Todd Rozelle
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
James v. United States of America
as 5:2024ct03134
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grady v. Cathey et al
as 3:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Tracey Terrell Grady
Defendant:
Eddie Cathey, FNU Dennis, FNU Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. Rich et al
as 5:2024ct03135
Plaintiff:
Roger Charles Day, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Rich, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
