Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Mesa-Lopez v. United States of America et al
as 6:2015cv04929
Plaintiff:
Alviero Mesa-Lopez
Defendant:
United States of America, Janis Richardson Hall, Isaac Johnson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Midyette v. US
as 15-7927
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH DIXON MIDYETTE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TERRENCE W. BOYLE, Judge and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00179
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00156
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Nobles v. United States of America et al
as 5:2015hc02129
Petitioner:
Cornelius Alvin Nobles
Respondent:
United States of America and Attorney General of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Midyette v. United States of America, et al
as 5:2015hc02108
Petitioner:
Joseph D. Midyette
Respondent:
United States of America, Terrence W. Boyle and Attorney General of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014de00199
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Burgess v. Attorney General of South Carolina et al
as 1:2014cv03157
Petitioner:
Albert Charles Burgess, Jr
Respondent:
Attorney General of South Carolina and Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burgess v. Attorney General of North Carolina et al
as 1:2014cv00202
Petitioner:
Albert Charles Burgess, Jr.
Respondent:
Attorney General of North Carolina and Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00047
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
