Cases 11 - 20 of 245
Paul Burt v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6466
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEIGH BURT
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Head Virginia Prisons, DR. WILLIAM MILES, Physician and DR. HENCHCROFF, Orthopedic Specialist
Jennings v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jennings
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Mack A. Bailey, Jr., Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marciano v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
Michael Marciano
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Watson
Defendant:
M. Hamilton, K.D. Ramey, Mr. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Britney Bates v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6431
Petitioner:
BRITNEY ODELL BATES
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, in his official capacity as Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Frank Reid v. Corizon Health Services
as 24-6422
Plaintiff:
FRANK REID
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, Virginia Department of Corrections Contract Medical Provider, J. BLEDSOE, Red Onion State Prison Medical Administrator, DOCTOR FOX, Red Onion State Prison Physician and others
Denzel Chandler v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6413
Petitioner:
DENZEL JOSHUA CHANDLER
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director
Ruhren v. Dotson, et al.
as 1:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruhren
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Anderson, A. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Smith
Defendant:
R. Owens, B. Dotson, T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Crout et al
as 7:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Eric Crout, Kristen Haight and Chad Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
