Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Fryar v. Foot et al
as 4:2014cv01167
Plaintiff:
Reginald Shontez Fryar
Defendant:
Colonial Foot, Terri Ann Roseneau, Beaufort County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Siefert et al
as 4:2014cv00928
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lorenzo Robinson
Defendant:
Doug Siefert, PJ Turner, Top Dollar Pawn and Sales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. Foot et al
as 4:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lorenzo Robinson and Reginald Shontez Fryar
Defendant:
Colonial Foot, Terri Ann Roseneau, Beaufort County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sun v. Foot
as 9:2010cv01758
Petitioner:
Joseph C Sun
Respondent:
Philip Foot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Atkins v. Pope et al
as 9:2009cv02629
Plaintiff:
Clinton Atkins
Defendant:
Michael Pope and Philip A Foot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Young v. Foot et al
as 3:2008cv00469
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Young
Defendant:
Phil Foot and County Council of Beaufort County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Stephens v. Kubic et al
as 4:2008cv00329
Plaintiff:
Michael T Stephens
Defendant:
Gary Kubic, Philip A Foot, Charlers Allen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Erickson et al
as 9:2007cv03976
Plaintiff:
Thomas Louis Davis
Defendant:
Eric J Erickson, Christine L Wilson, Larry Weidner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Davis v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 9:2007cv03621
Petitioner:
Thomas Louis Davis
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Phillip Foote
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Whitfield v. Beaufort County Council et al
as 3:2007cv02674
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Whitfield
Defendant:
Beaufort County Council, Gary Kubic, Philip A Foot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
