Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Paxton v. RCJC Staff
as 3:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jamar Paxton, Jr.
Defendant:
RCJC Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paxton v. Richmond City Justice Center
as 3:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jamar Paxton, Jr.
Defendant:
Richmond City Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paxton v. Settle et al
as 7:2021cv00409
Plaintiff:
Jamar Shante Paxton, Sr.
Defendant:
Gary T. Settle and Ralph Northam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paxton v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2020cv00483
Plaintiff:
Jamar Shante Paxton
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Virginia State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Buholtz v. Bart Carroll
as 17-7061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH LEO BUHOLTZ, on behalf of his minor children J.C.G. and L.S.B.
Defendant - Appellee:
BART CARROLL, Chief Investigator, DELIA GUILLAMONDEGUI, Supervisor, JOHN SPECIA, Commissioner and others
Kenneth Buholtz v. Bart Carroll
as 16-6438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH LEO BUHOLTZ, on behalf of his minor children JCG and LSB
Defendant - Appellee:
BART CARROLL, Chief Investigator, DELIA GUILLAMONDEGUI, Supervisor, JOHN SPECIA, Commissioner and others
Kenneth Buholtz v. Bart Carroll
as 16-6171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH LEO BUHOLTZ, on behalf of his minor children JCG and LSB
Defendant - Appellee:
BART CARROLL, Chief Investigator, DELIA GUILLAMONDEGUI, Supervisor, JOHN SPECIA, Commissioner and others
Buholtz v. Carroll et al
as 3:2015cv00520
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Leo Buholtz
Defendant:
Bart Carroll, Delia Guillamondegui, John Specia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paxton v. Walker et al
as 7:2011cv00551
Defendant:
Frank Maradavich and Captain Walker
Plaintiff:
Barry Judson Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paxton v. Pearson
as 3:2010cv00350
Petitioner:
Jamar Shante Paxton
Respondent:
Eddie L. Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
