Cases 21 - 30 of 338
Jackson v. White
as 2:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Wayne Alexander Jackson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rick White and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Durwin Bonds, Jr. v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6151
Plaintiff:
DURWIN EVANT BONDS, JR.
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director VA Dept. of Corrections, RICK WHITE, Warden of Red Onion State Prison, K. ALMARADE, Food Service ROSP and others
Lassiter v. Looney et al
as 7:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Looney, Lt. Fleming, Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Dept. of Corr. et al
as 7:2024cv00075
Petitioner:
Dennis Aubrey Jones
Respondent:
Dept. of Corr., Gov. Glenn Youngkin and Rick White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenneth Newkirk v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6056
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director Department of Corrections, LISA HERNANDEZ, WARDEN RICK WHITE and others
Crawley v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Cordero Crawley
Defendant:
Rick White, Quinn Reynolds and Nicholas Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baptist v. White
as 2:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Baptist
Respondent:
Rick White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. White
as 7:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Wayne Alexander Jackson, Jr.
Respondent:
Rick White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lassiter v. Looney et al
as 2:2023cv00681
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Looney, LT. Fleming, Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Mulky et al
as 7:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Davis
Defendant:
Todd Mulky, SWVRJA- Tazewell, Rick Albrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
