Cases 31 - 40 of 332
Johnson v. Department Public Safety Prisons Adult Corrections
as 5:2022cv00181
Petitioner:
Robert H. Johnson
Respondent:
Department Public Safety Prisons Adult Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Leverton et al
as 5:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Johnson
Defendant:
Brett A Leverton, Rico Hunt, Jaska Hughes Rominger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2022cv01024
Plaintiff:
DA'QUAHN A. ROBERTS
Defendant:
MARCUS SCOTT, VALRIS JERNIGAN, FNU WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Clark et al
as 5:2022ct03428
Plaintiff:
Calvin L. Harris
Defendant:
Betty H. Clark, Carmen Hendricks and Ronald Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rudisill v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Dwight A. Rudisill
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, David Alan Brown, Sr., Unknown United States Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Abdullah et al
as 5:2022ct03326
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson and Robert H. Johnson
Defendant:
Sgt. Quency Abdullah and Correctional Officer Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Ramos
as 5:2022hc02154
Petitioner:
Daniel H. King
Respondent:
Warden R. Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Floyd et al v. North Carolina State et al
as 5:2022ct03203
Plaintiff:
Tanis Floyd and Robert H. Wolfe
Defendant:
North Carolina State and Franklin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfe v. North Carolina State et al
as 5:2022ct03199
Plaintiff:
Howard H. Wolfe
Defendant:
North Carolina State and Franklin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fluid v. USA
as 3:2022cv00243
Petitioner:
Salatheo H. Fluid
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
