Cases 31 - 40 of 700
Pettis v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Austin Devon Pettis
Defendant:
FNU Jones, FNU Smith, FNU Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA
as 4:2023cv00125
Petitioner:
Howard Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hernandez-Gonzalez v. Jones
as 3:2023cv00366
Petitioner:
Esteban Hernandez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Timothy Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Dever et al
as 5:2023ct03153
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Levon Jones
Defendant:
James C. Dever, III, G. Alan DuBois, April Bun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Anderson v. Goodsum et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Albert Marquavious Lamar Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Goodsum, FNU Price, Doug Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Brown et al
as 5:2023ct03113
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Levon Jones
Defendant:
Ms. Brown, John Doe U.S. Marshal and Jane Doe U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, CATRINA AMELIA THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Davis et al
as 5:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
James Bernette Jones
Defendant:
FNU Davis, FNU Lili, FNU Parson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Weir et al
as 5:2023ct03064
Plaintiff:
Jamareo LaVar Caldwell
Defendant:
Brendan Weir, Christopher Jones, Joseph Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. USA
as 1:2023cv00191
Petitioner:
DANNY RAY JONES, SR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
