Cases 31 - 40 of 40
TOMPKINS v. U.S. MARSHAL
as 1:2013cv00346
Plaintiff:
STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHAL, UNITED STATES and MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. THE U.S. MARSHAL MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GREENSBORO
as 1:2012cv00114
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTHONY HARRIS
Defendant:
THE U.S. MARSHAL MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GREENSBORO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woods v. County of Wilson et al
as 5:2010ct03118
Plaintiff:
Isaac Lee Woods
Defendant:
County of Wilson, WILSON COUNTY MANAGER, Wayne Gay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODS v. COUNTY OF WILSON et al
as 1:2010cv00474
Plaintiff:
ISAAC LEE WOODS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF WILSON, WILSON COUNTY MANAGER, WAYNE GAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. BUREAU OF PRISON et al
as 1:2010cv00397
Petitioner:
PETE NOBLE MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISON and U.S. MARSHAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MUHAMMAD v. BUREAU OF PRISON et al
as 1:2010cv00267
Petitioner:
PETE NOBLE MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISON, U.S. MARSHAL and ORANGE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MUHAMMAD v. BUREAU OF PRISON et al
as 1:2010cv00225
Petitioner:
PETE NOBLE MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISON , U.S. MARSHAL and ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GAMBRELL v. U.S. MARSHAL'S OFFICE
as 1:2008cv00284
Plaintiff:
LLOYD P. GAMBRELL
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tucker v. United States Attorney et al
as 5:2008hc02025
Petitioner:
Cornelius Tucker, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Attorney, Felice Corpening, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ROBINSON v. CALHOUN et al
as 1:2007cv00077
Plaintiff:
RESTONEY ROBINSON
Defendant:
PAUL B. CALHOUN, HOWARD L. WOOTERS, COX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
