Cases 31 - 40 of 525
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00350
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ij Federal Question Injunction and Declaratory Relief
Powell v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00133
Petitioner:
Frank D. Powell
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ortiz v. Coakley et al
as 3:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Raul Ortiz
Defendant:
LT D. Coakley, CT M. Duff, LT D. Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vega v. Cramer
as 3:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Saul Vega
Defendant:
Jeffrey D. Cramer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00200
Petitioner:
Wallace D. Gilbert
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Young v. Young et al
as 5:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Young
Defendant:
Warden D. L. Young, Warden Heckard, B. L. Fain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McNeal v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00132
Petitioner:
Cory D. McNeal
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Boone v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00109
Petitioner:
Omarr D. Boone
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Morgan v. Young et al
as 5:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Dairion E. Morgan
Defendant:
FCI Beckley Warden Young, FCI Beckley Warden Heckard, Doctor Roger Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Syner v. McDowell County Commission et al
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
John D. Syner
Defendant:
McDowell County Commission and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
