Cases 41 - 50 of 698
Harrison v. Bullard et al
as 5:2023ct03079
Plaintiff:
Marqueion Jamal Harrison
Defendant:
Warden Bullard, Stephen Jacobs, Sgt. Leggett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON-BEY v. SHELTON et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
LEROY RICHARDSON-BEY
Defendant:
WARDEN M. SHELTON, SGT. WATSON, WARDEN BRAYBOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodman v. Moose et al
as 1:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Shawn Louis Goodman
Defendant:
Timothy Darryl Moose, Larry Williamson, Mike Slacole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holcomb v. Tillett et al
as 5:2023hc02017
Petitioner:
Cassandra Wright Holcomb
Respondent:
Jerry R. Tillett, Mag. Greg T. Dail, Mag. William H. Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MUSGROVE v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2022cv01125
Plaintiff:
SAQUAN S. MUSGROVE
Defendant:
TODD ISHEE, KATE POOLE, DEAN LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez-Gonzalez v. Jones
as 5:2022hc02192
Petitioner:
Esteban Hernandez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Timothy Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Epley et al
as 1:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee Jones
Defendant:
FNU Epley and FNU Wiseman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Buffaloe
as 3:2022cv00553
Petitioner:
Rodney Eugene Jones
Respondent:
Eddie Buffaloe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prevette v. Gaither et al
as 5:2022ct03367
Plaintiff:
Brandon Matthew Prevette
Defendant:
Dr. Lisa Gaither, Dental Assistant Blany, Nurse Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. HAFEEZ et al
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
SGT. MR. HAFEEZ, SGT. MR. HUNT, OFFICER MR. BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
