Cases 41 - 50 of 81
James C. Austin v. Fredreck Schilling
as 15-7445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES C. AUSTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
FREDRECK SCHILLING, MD/Head Medical Director, HAPPY SMITH, Doctor, ELLA DAVIDSON, Registered Nurse and others
Malcolm Kinley, Jr. v. Randy Register
as 15-6869
Petitioner - Appellant:
MALCOLM LEE KINLEY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY REGISTER
Calvin Barber v. Randy Register
as 15-6712
Petitioner - Appellant:
CALVIN WAYNE BARBER
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY REGISTER
Barber v. Register
as 5:2015hc02016
Petitioner:
Calvin Wayne Barber
Respondent:
Randy Register
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OGENE v. REGISTER
as 1:2015cv00087
Petitioner:
ASHYBUDIKE FRIDAY OGENE
Respondent:
RANDY REGISTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joseph Bratcher v. City of Newport News
as 14-7895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ALLEN BRATCHER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, Policy maker / holder, Highest authority, SYREETA T. DAWKINS, License Clinical Social Worker with NNCJ, VALARIE A. GASKINS, Health Services Administrator, Registered Nurse with Conmed and others
Defendant:
NEWPORT NEWS SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Kinley v. Register
as 5:2014hc02239
Petitioner:
Malcolm Lee Kinley, Jr.
Respondent:
Randy Register
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alonzo Copeland, Jr. v. J. Shrom / RN
as 14-7044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALONZO DENNIS COPELAND, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
J. SHROM, Registered Nurse, A. FREEMAN, Registered Nurse, C/O CLARK, Lieutenant and others
Defendant:
MS. MASSENBURG, ex. Institutional Ombudsman, MS. C. BOONE, ex. Institutional Ombudsman, R. WOODSON, Regional Ombudsman and others
Kenneth Bryant v. Marie Vargo
as 14-6807
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIE VARGO, Warden, TERRA MOORE, Medical Administrator, S. HICKS, Registered Nurse and others
Vincent Allen v. Randy Register
as 14-6787
Petitioner - Appellant:
VINCENT BRADY ALLEN
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY REGISTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
