Cases 41 - 50 of 1,778
Moss v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv02642
Petitioner:
Michael Jerome Moss
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02665
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirchner v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv02595
Petitioner:
Ronald Kirchner
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Koram v. Prince George's County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv02527
Plaintiff:
Akosua Boafoa Koram
Defendant:
Prince George's County Jail, Department of Children and Families (DCF) Baltimmore, Director Ms. Galloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv02522
Plaintiff:
Amari Brandon
Defendant:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Richie
as 1:2023cv02416
Plaintiff:
Charles K. Hamilton
Defendant:
State of Maryland Treasury and Jennifer Richie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv02316
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Martin
Defendant:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Booze v. Lewter
as 1:2023cv02246
Plaintiff:
Gordon Everette Booze, IV
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Metropolitan Transition Center, Saiquan Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Booze v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv02248
Plaintiff:
Gordon E. Booze, IV
Defendant:
State of Maryland and Baltimore Central Booking Intake Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Elsa Newman v. State of Maryland
as 23-6793
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELSA NEWMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND, PAROLE OFFICER JANICE GARCIA and DIRECTOR MARTHA DANNER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
