Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 106
US v. Raymond Edward Chestnut We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-6078
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray
Witherspoon v. Marshall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2016cv03867
Plaintiff: Jarode Jermaine Witherspoon
Defendant: NFN Marshall, Lt Chestnut, Tim Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chestnut v. Warden Lieber Correctional Institution We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv02912
Petitioner: Antoine F Chestnut
Respondent: Warden Lieber Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chestnut v. Ebbert We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02521
Petitioner: Raymond Edward Chestnut
Respondent: David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chestnut v. USA
as 4:2016cv02013
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Raymond Edward Chestnut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chestnut v. Ebbert We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01412
Petitioner: Raymond Chestnut
Respondent: David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chestnut v. USA
as 4:2016cv01371
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Raymond Edward Chestnut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chestnut v. Ebbert We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01221
Petitioner: Raymond Chestnut
Respondent: David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chestnut v. Ebbert We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00203
Petitioner: Raymond E Chestnut
Respondent: David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chestnut v. USA
as 4:2015cv04304
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Joe Roger Chestnut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?