Cases 51 - 60 of 1,097
Young v. Stuart et al
as 7:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Larry Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Dean Stuart, Eric Pluta, Michael Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv01210
Plaintiff:
Justin Clark
Defendant:
United States of America, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Anthony Martin v. Erin Gaffney
as 23-6870
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY SHANE MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIN GAFFNEY, LISA YOUNG, RAY WALKER and others
Defendant:
WELLPATH/CORRECT CARE
Young v. Stirling et al
as 6:2023cv04392
Plaintiff:
Willie Young
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling, Jerry B. Adger and Shirley C. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
US v. Michael Young, Jr.
as 23-6830
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES YOUNG, JR., a/k/a Unc
Young v. State of South Carolina
as 9:2023cv04137
Plaintiff:
State of South Carolina
Defendant:
Robert Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Meyers v. Ms. Marshall
as 23-6806
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. MARSHALL, American with Disabilities Act Coordinator, MS. COX, Medical Department Supervisor, MAILROOM STAFF and others
Young v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Kareem Al-Jamal Young
Defendant:
Warden J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Young v. Weaver et al
as 3:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Larry Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Erik Weaver, Sarah McKnight, Scott Woodward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2023cv03505
Petitioner:
MonQuez J. Young
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Warden of Livesay Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
