Cases 51 - 60 of 525
A.D. v. Demetro et al
as 2:2022cv00432
Plaintiff:
A. D.
Defendant:
Anthony Demetro, David Jones, Matthew Currence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed, Corp Sole v. Whitmer et al
as 3:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed, Corp Sole doing business as Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant:
Chris Whitmer, Erick Helenihi, April Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Daniels et al v. Mingo County Commission et al
as 2:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
Michelle Daniels, Robert Lee Daniels, Jr., Minor C. D. and others
Defendant:
Mingo County Commission, Mingo County Sheriff Joe Smith, Lt. E. Sherrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henley v. McCaffery
as 3:2022cv00086
Petitioner:
Dwight D. Henley
Respondent:
McCaffery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Myles v. Hong et al
as 3:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Ronald R. Myles, Jr.
Defendant:
Chaplain Y. Hong, D. Husk, C.O. D. Burkett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stilwell v. SFF Hazelton
as 3:2022cv00039
Petitioner:
Makayla D. Stilwell
Respondent:
SFF Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hoover v. Corbin et al
as 3:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Hoover
Defendant:
Patricia D. Corbin, Christopher Meyer, Ellen Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Campbell v. Warden, SFF Hazelton
as 5:2022cv00053
Petitioner:
Alisha D. Campbell
Respondent:
Warden, SFF Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kennedy v. SFF Hazelton
as 5:2022cv00054
Petitioner:
April D. Kennedy
Respondent:
SFF Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hurt v. Tate
as 5:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Hurt
Defendant:
D. Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
