Cases 61 - 70 of 107
Patrick Guess v. Cecilia Reynold
as 11-7153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK GUESS
Defendant - Appellee:
CECILIA R. REYNOLDS, Warden, Kershaw Correctional Institution, TIMOTHY RILEY, Warden, Tyger River Institution, JON OZMINT, Agency Director and others
Willie Singletary v. Warden Kershaw Correct. Inst.
as 11-6764
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIE JAMES SINGLETARY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
McFadden v. Warden of Kershaw Correctional Institution
as 3:2011cv00959
Petitioner:
Bernard McFadden
Respondent:
Warden of Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Staton v. Kershaw Corr Inst
as 8:2011cv00745
Petitioner:
Leroy Staton
Respondent:
Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Praylow v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 0:2011cv00407
Petitioner:
Al-Tericke Praylow
Respondent:
Warden of Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bell v. South Carolina
as 2:2011cv00406
Petitioner:
John X Bell
Respondent:
Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moss v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 2:2010cv02300
Petitioner:
Corey Moss
Respondent:
Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wayne Leneau v. Warden, Kershaw Correctional
as 10-6793
Petitioner - Appellant:
WAYNE DOUGLAS LENEAU
Respondent - Appellee:
KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Singletary v. South Carolina, State of
as 8:2010cv01305
Petitioner:
Willie James Singletary
Respondent:
Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William McKinnedy, III v. Cecil Reynold
as 10-6456
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CLAYTON MCKINNEDY, III
Defendant - Appellee:
CECIL REYNOLDS, Warden at Kershaw Correctional Institution and et al., ROBERT E. WARD, a/k/a Bob Ward, JON OZMINT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.