Cases 71 - 80 of 4,145
Daniel Jamison v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6132
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, MARK AMONETTE, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, NATARCHA GREGG, M.S.A., RD., State Wide Dietician and others
Lumpkin v. Clarke of Mental Health at Sussex I State Prison
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Clarke of Mental Health at Sussex I State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024ct03032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Siddhanth Sharma v. Demetrius Clark
as 24-1107
Plaintiff:
SIDDHANTH SHARMA
Defendant:
DEMETRIUS A. CLARK, FELIX TAYLOR, DEAN HEFFERNAN and others
Siddhanth Sharma v. Demetrius Clark
as 24-1106
Plaintiff:
SIDDHANTH SHARMA
Defendant:
DEMETRIUS A. CLARK, FELIX TAYLOR, DEAN HEFFERNAN and others
Lumpkin v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Virginia Department Of Corrections, Kemsy Bowles, K.T. Punturi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Newkirk v. K. Fleming
as 24-6063
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT K. M. FLEMING, HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director, Dept. of Corrections, CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Dept. of Corrections and others
Kenneth Newkirk v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6057
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
HAROLD C. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director Department of Corrections
Kenneth Newkirk v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6056
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director Department of Corrections, LISA HERNANDEZ, WARDEN RICK WHITE and others
Burrell v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell
Defendant:
David Anderson, K. Burcham, CJ MacVean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
