Cases 71 - 80 of 317
Jackson v. Gregory et al
as 2:2020cv00607
Defendant:
WellPath/Henrico Jail Med Staff, Henrico County Sheriff Dept. and Alisa Gregory
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Jackson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv00887
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Court of Legal of the Dept. of Corrections and Tammy B. Williams
Plaintiff:
Willie Thomas Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00511
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudgins v. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 7:2020cv00531
Defendant:
Warden David Zook, Joseph Ely and Dept. of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Tarik Hudgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sawyer v. Carlton
as 7:2020cv00510
Defendant:
Howard Carlton, Southern West of Virginia Regional Jail, Medical Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Larry T. Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Gilmore et al
as 2:2020cv00444
Defendant:
Ofc. Cornelius Bland, Joseph Walters, QMHP - Ms. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gulbranson v. Virginia Dept. of Corrections, Lawrenceville Corr. Center et al
as 1:2020cv00900
Petitioner:
Robert Murray Gulbranson and Dexter Poe
Respondent:
Virginia Dept. of Corrections, Lawrenceville Corr. Center and Michael Bracken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Warren v. Deacon et al
as 1:2020cv00685
Defendant:
Franklin Police Dept., T. Deacon, City of Franklin, VA and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel M. Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shearin v. Virginia Dept of Corrections
as 2:2020cv00334
Plaintiff:
Charles McCoy Shearin
Defendant:
Virginia Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Clarke et al
as 3:2020cv00500
Plaintiff:
Deandre Treshawn Moore
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, VA Dept of Corrections and Deep Meadows Corr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
