Cases 81 - 90 of 95
Alvarez v. Warden
as 2:2012cv00050
Petitioner:
Derrick Alvarez
Respondent:
FCI Gilmer Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Atkins v. FCI Gilmer Administration et al
as 5:2011cv00086
Petitioner:
Michael Atkins
Respondent:
FCI Gilmer Administration, DeBoo, Oden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Arnett Cobb v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr.
as 11-6445
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARNETT COBB
Respondent - Appellee:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., Chair, US PAROLE COMMISSION, SCOTT KUBIK, Hearing Examiner, U.S. Parole Commission and others
Roy Davis v. US
as 10-7031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY STEVE DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director of Bureau of Prisons, TERRY O'BRIEN, Warden USP-Lee and others
Bowman v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 5:2008cv00157
Petitioner:
Shawn Lamar Bowman
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McDonald v. Warden et al
as 3:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
Timothy McDonald
Defendant:
FCI Gilmer Warden, Harley Lapin, B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Razzoli v. Middle District Court Clerk (MD. Pa.) et al
as 2:2008cv00057
Petitioner:
Kevin Razzoli
Respondent:
Middle District Court Clerk (MD. Pa.), Warden FCI Gilmer (Nominal), G W Bush and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Taylor v. County of DeKalb, Georgia et al
as 3:2008cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jason Taylor
Defendant:
County of DeKalb, Georgia, State of Georgia Attorney General and Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
George v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 1:2007cv00147
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Robert George
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
George v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 2:2007cv00673
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Robert George
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
