Cases 81 - 90 of 178
TYLER v. BARCELLONA et al
as 1:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
MILO DANIEL TYLER
Defendant:
TOM BARCELLONA, ANDREW P. CLEMENT, WILLIAMS W. BAGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobble v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2018ct03050
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, US Bureau of Prisons, US Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN-BEY v. COOPER et al
as 1:2018cv00146
Plaintiff:
EDDRICCO LISHAUN BROWN-BEY
Defendant:
ROY COOPER, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, MARCUS PLESCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Whiteville Hospital et al
as 5:2018ct03032
Plaintiff:
Marvin Green
Defendant:
Whiteville Hospital, Columbus County Sheriff's Office, City of Whiteville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Whiteville Hospital et al
as 3:2018cv00069
Plaintiff:
Marvin Green
Defendant:
Whiteville Hospital, Columbus County Sheriff Office, City of Whiteville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. City of Gastonia
as 3:2018cv00061
Plaintiff:
Lester Barnett
Defendant:
City of Gastonia
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, JEFFREY BAREFOOT, R. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Murray et al
as 1:2017cv00329
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Joseph Martin
Defendant:
Chad Murray, Rutherfordton City Police Dept., Rutherford County Jail Admin. and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. The City of Rocky Mount et al
as 5:2017ct03270
Plaintiff:
Irvin Jermain Fields
Defendant:
The City of Rocky Mount, Officer Robinson and Officer Western
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2017ct03253
Plaintiff:
Eddricco L. Brown
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Mecklenburg County and City of Charlotte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
