Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Braxton v. Director of Health Services et al
as 1:2017cv00340
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Braxton
Defendant:
Director of Health Services, Gregory Holloway, Carolyn M. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Artis Baines v. C. Hick
as 17-6068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTIS BAINES
Defendant - Appellee:
C. HICKS, Assistant Food Operations Directors at Greensville Correctional Center, KATHYRN WHITEHEAD, Assistant Food Operations Directors at Greensville Correctional Center, ANTHONY ANDERSON, Food Operations Director at GRCC and others
Defendant:
JOYNER, Food Service Manager at the Greensville Correctional Center and C. CREQUE, Food Service Manager at the Greensville Correctional Center
Buchanan v. Byrd et al
as 1:2015cv01507
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Tyr Konr Buchanan
Defendant:
Theresa S. Byrd, Carolyn M. Parker and A. D. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnathan Lee X v. A. Robinson
as 15-6618
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNATHAN LEE X SMITH, a/k/a Jonathan Lee Smith, a/k/a Jonathan Lee X Smith, a/k/a Johnathan Lee X Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
A. D. ROBINSON, Chief of Operations, sued individually and in official capacity, HAROLD CLARKE, Director, sued individually and in official capacity, GREGORY HOLLOWAY, Regional Administrator, sued individually and in official capacity and others
X v. Robinson et al
as 3:2015cv00134
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee X
Defendant:
A. D. Robinson, Harold Clarke, Gregory Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De Armond v. Prison Health Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00536
Plaintiff:
Arnold De Armond
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc., George M. Hinkle, G.L. Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00536
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
