Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Willis v. Ruff et al
as 5:2024ct03102
Plaintiff:
Andrew Reginald Willis
Defendant:
Mark C. Ruff, City Of Fayetteville, Sgt. James Yowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormick v. Wright et al
as 5:2023ct03028
Plaintiff:
Markus Odon McCormick
Defendant:
Sheriff Ennis Wright, Deputy Sheriff Jamie McLeod, Officer Ramon Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormick v. Graham et al
as 5:2022ct03020
Plaintiff:
Markus Odon McCormick
Defendant:
Sasha Graham, City of Fayetteville and Fayetteville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Hockenberry et al
as 5:2020ct03073
Defendant:
Sgt. Hardin, Fayetteville Police Department, City of Fayetteville and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Reginald Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Hockenberry et al
as 5:2019ct03182
Defendant:
Fayetteville Police Department, Glenda Ann Pope Lambert, City of Fayetteville and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Reginald Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, JEFFREY BAREFOOT, R. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2017cv00810
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, R. M. ASHLEY, RON SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. MACKEY et al
as 1:2017cv00456
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
K. D. MACKEY, C.C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C. C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv01408
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
