Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Love v. Flowers et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Love
Defendant:
Brandon S. Flowers A.U.S.A., F.C.I Hazelton Warden Rey, F.C.I. Hazelton S.I.S. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Love v. Flowers et al
as 3:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Jerry Dean Love
Respondent:
A.U.S.A. Brandon S. Flowers and U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of West Virginia at Clarksburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McKinley v. USA
as 1:2023cv00105
Petitioner:
Randy Dean McKinley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Skaggs v. Hoke et al
as 2:2023cv00759
Petitioner:
Shelby Dean Skaggs
Respondent:
Jay M. Hoke, Victor Navy, T. M. Divita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Day v. US Marshal Service et al
as 3:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
Eric Day
Defendant:
US Marshal Service, Western Regional Jail, West Virginia Regional Jail Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Ray et al
as 5:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Todd G. Dean
Defendant:
Mrs. Ray and Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dean v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Todd G. Dean
Defendant:
Mrs. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dean v. Mrs. Brown, et al
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Todd G. Dean
Defendant:
Warden Mrs. Brown, Counselor, Case Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Trevino v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00082
Petitioner:
Dean Trevino
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00056
Petitioner:
Dean Anderson
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
