Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Markus McCormick v. Sasha Graham
as 23-6231
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARKUS ODON MCCORMICK
Defendant / Appellee:
SASHA GRAHAM, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, FAYETTEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Markus McCormick v. Sasha Graham
as 22-7463
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARKUS ODON MCCORMICK
Defendant / Appellee:
SASHA GRAHAM, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, FAYETTEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
McCormick v. Graham et al
as 5:2022ct03020
Plaintiff:
Markus Odon McCormick
Defendant:
Sasha Graham, City of Fayetteville and Fayetteville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Fayetteville Police Department et al
as 5:2020ct03329
Plaintiff:
Keyshawn Matthews
Defendant:
Josea Figueroa, Jamaal Littlejohn, Mackenzie Harter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Supervisor et al
as 5:2020ct03202
Defendant:
Mark C. Ruff, Fayetteville Police Department, State of North Carolina and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Reginald Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Hockenberry et al
as 5:2020ct03073
Defendant:
Sgt. Hardin, Fayetteville Police Department, City of Fayetteville and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Reginald Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Hockenberry et al
as 5:2019ct03182
Defendant:
Fayetteville Police Department, Glenda Ann Pope Lambert, City of Fayetteville and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Reginald Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLean v. Ammons et al
as 5:2018ct03288
Defendant:
Officer T. Smith, Judge Thomas D. Haigwood, J.M. Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Habimana Lisimba McLean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herman Harris v. Zachery Pittman
as 17-7308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERMAN HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZACHERY PITTMAN, Fayetteville Police Department
Defendant:
MOOSE BUTLER
Lurch, Jr. v. Fayetteville Police Department
as 5:2016ct03133
Plaintiff:
Robert Derek Lurch, Jr.
Defendant:
Fayetteville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
