Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Gladden v. Johnson et al
as 5:2024ct03226
Defendant:
Ms. Henderson, Harley Johnson, David Bohanon and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone D. Gladden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Franklin et al
as 5:2024ct03128
Defendant:
F. Reynolds, N. Ross, Allison Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
David Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00293
Petitioner:
ANTONIO DEVON HENDERSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Henderson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
Loren Parnell Henderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Atkins v. Henderson County Detention Center
as 1:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Mattie Crystal Atkins
Respondent:
Henderson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Atkins v. Henderson County Detention Center
as 5:2024hc02029
Petitioner:
Mattie Atkins
Respondent:
Henderson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Atkins v. Henderson County Detention Center
as 5:2024hc02028
Petitioner:
Mattie Atkins
Respondent:
Henderson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jeremy Lamond Henderson Trust v. Haynes
as 3:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lamond Henderson Trust
Defendant:
Brad Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeremy Lamond Henderson Trust v. Haynes
as 3:2023cv00583
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lamond Henderson Trust
Defendant:
Brad Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patterson v. Henderson County Det. et al
as 1:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Tony Michael Patterson
Defendant:
Henderson County Det., Dakota Wolfe, FNU Staggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
