Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Edwards v. Mathena et al
as 7:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Michael Derrick Edwards
Defendant:
Randall C. Mathena, Lois Fegan, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruhren v. Dotson, et al.
as 1:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruhren
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Warden Anderson, A. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeFour v. Mailroom Supervisor JB et al
as 7:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Jeremy DeFour
Defendant:
Mailroom Supervisor JB, Warden Rick White and Major J. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. Stump et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis and Jaeon Chavis
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Stump, J.A. Murray, Alfed Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloman v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Shavis Holloman
Defendant:
Rick White, D. Turner, Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Brown v. D. Leu
as 23-6120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES W. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
D. LEU, Warden, D. SMITH, Captain, R. CARMONA, Unit Manager and others
Brown et al v. Leu et al
as 1:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
James W Brown, Matthew J Collins, Michael Vasquez and others
Defendant:
D. Leu, D. Smith, R. Carmona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Moore et al
as 3:2020cv00079
Plaintiff:
Quinton Andrews
Defendant:
Officer Laura A. McGlone, Officer Isaac Thomas, Officer William C. Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric DePaola v. Harold Clarke
as 17-7067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC JOSEPH DEPAOLA
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, A. DAVID ROBINSON, EARL BARKSDALE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
