Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00910
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01520
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03659
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03190
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01534
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Emang Matenge v. Jeffery Crawford
as 17-6598
Petitioner - Appellant:
EMANG MATENGE
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFERY CRAWFORD, Director & Officer-in-Charge of Farmiville Detention Center, YVONNE EVANS, Director, Washington, D.C. Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement Office of Detention and Removal Operations, Department of Homeland Security, THOMAS HOMAN, Executive Associate Director, Enforcement & Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Elsayedri v. Lynch et al
as 1:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
Younis Elsayedri
Defendant:
Loretta E. Lynch, Richard Cropp, Thomas Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Same v. Crawford et al
as 3:2017cv00077
Petitioner:
Konate Same
Respondent:
Jeffrey Crawford, Richard Cropp, Yvonne Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Yintang v. Cropp et al
as 2:2017cv00030
Petitioner:
Cao Yintang
Respondent:
Richard Cropp, M. Yvonne Evans, Thomas Homan and others
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
