Cases 1 - 10 of 702
Jones v. Locklear
as 5:2024hc02110
Petitioner:
Michael Contrez Jones
Respondent:
Warden Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02107
Petitioner:
Rodney Moucell Jones
Respondent:
Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROOKS v. RICKER et al
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
RASHAWN A. BROOKS
Defendant:
OFFICER RICKER, OFFICER JONES, OFFICER SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. MCLEAN et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
YAW NYADU HARRISON
Defendant:
ZERRANTI MCLEAN, JOHN DOE, MR. NEU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Strickland et al
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Thaddeaus Jones
Respondent:
David Strickland and Baniecia Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Ishee
as 1:2024cv00138
Petitioner:
Rodney Moucell Jones
Respondent:
Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hanson v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024ct03084
Plaintiff:
Rodger Hanson
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Tim Jones, Warden Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali v. Sledge et al
as 5:2024ct03080
Plaintiff:
Abdulkadir Sharif Ali
Defendant:
Wendy Sledge, Kenneth Washington, William Riddick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Foothills Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
Foothills Correctional Institution, FNU Hudgins, FNU Motley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Howard et al
as 5:2024ct03063
Plaintiff:
Darius Tremayne Brooks
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Howard, Sgt. Johnson, Sgt. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
