Cases 1 - 10 of 30
David v. Young et al
as 2:2023cv04578
Plaintiff:
Lewis Albertus David
Defendant:
Honorable Roger M. Young, Honorable C. Vance Stricklin and Honorable Alex Kinlaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Little v. Copeland-Little et al
as 4:2023cv02081
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr.
Defendant:
Attorney Tony Copeland-Little, Doctor Matthew Gaskins, Prosecutor Kernard Redmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Little v. Cutchin et al
as 4:2023cv01697
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr.
Defendant:
Chesterfield County, Judge Paul M. Burch, Judge Roger M. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Young-Bey v. Young et al
as 1:2017cv03585
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M Young-Bey
Defendant:
Jay Young, David Blumberg and Maryland Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03124
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cline v. Horry Co Solicitor's Office et al
as 4:2017cv00623
Plaintiff:
Michael James Cline
Defendant:
Horry Co Solicitor's Office, Robert Colher, Willie Eagleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young-Bey v. Miller et al
as 1:2016cv03435
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Young-Bey
Defendant:
Richard E. Miller, Wayne Webb, T. Faith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young-Bey v. Warden
as 1:2015cv03644
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Young-Bey
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young-Bey v. Daddysboy, COS et al
as 1:2015cv03642
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Young-Bey
Defendant:
B. A. Daddysboy, COS, Major Mellot, A. Butler, COL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young-Bey v. Natale et al
as 1:2015cv01069
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Young-Bey
Defendant:
P. R. Natale, J. Smith, K. McCuster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
