Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Outlaw v. Meade et al
as 2:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Outlaw
Defendant:
Barbara Meade, Dr. Johnson and Dr. Ober
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loughner v. Ober et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Robert Loughner
Defendant:
Peter Ober and Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burks v. Ober et al
as 2:2023cv00639
Plaintiff:
Talmadge V. Burks, Jr.
Defendant:
Peter Ober and Kevin Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pryor v. Chestnut, et al
as 7:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Fred E. Pryor, Jr.
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail, Ms. Chestnut, Ms. Lynda Mood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Hammer v. Barry Munsey
as 22-6534
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY LEON HAMMER
Defendant / Appellee:
BARRY MUNSEY, REGINA CHESTNUT and LORI NICHOLSON
Defendant:
PATRICK OBER, DR. OTTOLINI and DR. HEREFORD
Hammer v. Ober et al
as 7:2020cv00526
Defendant:
Barry Muncey, Lori Nichelson, Patrick Ober and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Leon Hammer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russ v. Meade et al
as 1:2019cv01571
Defendant:
Lorri Rohme, J Smith, Phil Grimes and others
Plaintiff:
Justin M. Russ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richard Sullivan v. Peter Ober
as 17-6958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD A. SULLIVAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER OBER, Doctor- P.C, BARBARA MEAD, Head Nurse, ROBERT A. DRYDEN, Doctor-P.C and others
Raymond Sims-Lewis v. James Willett
as 17-6442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND E. SIMS-LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES C. WILLETT, Superintendent, PAMUNKEY REGIONAL JAIL, Owner, DWIGHT C. JONES, Mayor and others
Raymond Sims-Lewis v. James Willett
as 17-6437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND E. SIMS-LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES C. WILLETT, Superintendent, PAMUNKEY REGIONAL JAIL, Owner, DWIGHT C. JONES, Mayor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
