Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Reddick v. Holt et al
as 2:2011cv02295
Plaintiff:
Belay Reddick
Defendant:
Ray Holt, Mary M Mitchell, Joseph Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 2:2011cv00287
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Holmes
Defendant:
Harvey G Lappin, Darlene Drew, Tovia Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Nolan v. Matthew Hamidullah
as 11-6070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL NOLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW B. HAMIDULLAH, KATHRYN MACK, RAY HOLT and others
Thomas v. Slater et al
as 9:2010cv00425
Plaintiff:
Rodagus Marilento Thomas, Sr
Defendant:
Esther Slater, Ray Holt and Harrell Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Thomas v. Slater et al
as 9:2010cv00028
Plaintiff:
Rodagus Marilento Thomas
Defendant:
Esther Slater, Ray Holt and Harrell Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Robert Reynolds, II v. J. Neal
as 08-6821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE REYNOLDS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
J. NEAL, Unit Manager at FCI Edgefield, JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden at FCI Edgefield, RAY HOLT, Regional Director and others
Riches v. Holt
as 6:2008cv01169
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Ray Holt
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Carr v. Holt
as 07-7508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN D. CARR
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY HOLT, Regional Director of Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator, JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden of FCI Edgefield and others
Reynolds v. Neal et al
as 4:2007cv01724
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Reynolds
Defendant:
J Neal, J Lamanna, Ray Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Nolan v. Hamidullah et al
as 4:2007cv01141
Plaintiff:
Michael Nolan
Defendant:
Matthew Hamidullah, M Rivera, Katheryn Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
