Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 419
Loren et al v. Jackson et al
as 5:2024ct03225
Plaintiff: Webster R. Neumann, Bobby Reece, Roger W. Clark and others
Defendant: Haley Phillips, Darren Jackson, Graham Atkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02156
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Peters v. Hernandez et al
as 5:2024ct03195
Defendant: Burgaw Police Department, Lt. Rogers, Sgt. Hernandez and others
Plaintiff: Dean Rene Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. USA
as 1:2024cv00704
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: ROGER WAYNE JONES, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rogers v. Bullard
as 5:2024hc02106
Respondent: Jamie Bullard
Petitioner: Antwarn Lee Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Day v. Rich et al
as 5:2024ct03135
Defendant: Warden Rich, Director, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff: Roger Charles Day, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Charles v. USA
as 1:2024cv00125
Petitioner: Roger Dale Charles, II
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
TISDALE v. WEAVIL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff: IVORY JOE TISDALE
Defendant: T.A. WEAVIL, DANNY ROGERS, VERONICA L. EDMINSTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. USA
as 3:2024cv00181
Petitioner: Mario Reginald Rogers
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ford v. Stone et al
as 5:2024ct03001
Plaintiff: Jarred J. Ford
Defendant: Keith Stone, Sheriff Bond Surety, Major Allen Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?