Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Kilpatrick v. Anderson et al
as 1:2021cv00244
Plaintiff:
Andrew Tab Kilpatrick
Defendant:
Jacob Darrell Anderson, Cherokee County Sheriff Department, FNU Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stiles v. Norwood
as 1:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
Donald Stiles
Defendant:
Gina Norwood
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Stiles v. Cook et al
as 5:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Stiles, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Cook and Alexander Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Texas Dept. Of Criminal Justice et al
as 8:2015cv00348
Plaintiff:
James A. Jackson
Defendant:
Texas Dept. Of Criminal Justice, Mark Stiles Unit, Executive Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stiles v. Collins
as 5:2014ct03193
Plaintiff:
Donald Eugene Stiles, Jr.
Defendant:
Nurse Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James McClelland v. Randy Teague
as 13-6884
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES FRANKLIN MCCLELLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY TEAGUE, Superintendent Marion Correctional Center, KEITH TURNER, Unit Manager Marion Correctional Center, J. STILES, Correctional Officer Marion Correctional Center and others
James McClelland v. Randy Teague
as 13-6884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES FRANKLIN MCCLELLAND
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDY TEAGUE, Superintendent Marion Correctional Center, KEITH TURNER, Unit Manager Marion Correctional Center, J. STILES, Correctional Officer Marion Correctional Center and others
Stiles v. Keener
as 1:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Stiles, Jr.
Defendant:
Larry Keener
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Stiles v. Schick et al
as 1:2013de00103
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Stiles, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Schick and John Briadshaw
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Stiles v. Marsh et al
as 1:2013de00086
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Stiles, Jr.
Defendant:
James Marsh and Bobby Suttles
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
