Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Harris v. McBride
as 3:2013cv00161
Petitioner:
Henry B. Harris
Defendant:
Thomas McBride
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gray v. McBride
as 5:2013cv00471
Plaintiff:
Alfred Gray
Defendant:
Thomas McBride
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Rabb v. Thomas McBride
as 11-6612
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID RABB
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS MCBRIDE, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Donald Barbe v. Thomas McBride
as 10-7598
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD RAYMOND BARBE
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS MCBRIDE
Cornell Daye v. Jim Rubenstein
as 10-6938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORNELL F. DAYE
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner Department of Corrections (Under and up to the limits of the liabitliy insurance coverage), CHARLENE SOTAK, Grievance Coordinator Department of Corrections (Under and up to the limits of the State's liability insurance coverage), THOMAS MCBRIDE, Ex-Warden Mount Olive Correctional Complex (Individually and Officially or Alternatively under and up to the limits of the State's liability insurance coverage) and others
James Pipes v. Correctional Medical Services
as 10-6032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES FRANKLIN PIPES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK LLC and others
Daye v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2009cv00909
Plaintiff:
Cornell F. Daye
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Charlene Sotak, Thomas McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forrest Kyle v. Thomas McBride
as 09-6788
Petitioner - Appellant:
FORREST RAY KYLE
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS MCBRIDE, Warden, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex and WARDEN DAVID BALLARD
Rabb v. McBride
as 2:2009cv00159
Plaintiff:
David Rabb
Defendant:
Thomas McBride
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dean v. Rider et al.
as 2:2008cv00050
Plaintiff:
Scott Dean
Defendant:
C. J. Rider, David Ballard, Thomas McBride and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
