Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lester v. Ojo et al
as 5:2023ct03363
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
A. Odu, N. Harris, J. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2023ct03349
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Legal Mail Clerk, Bryant C. Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Unknown Doe#1 et al
as 5:2023ct03350
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
Unknown Doe#1, Unknown Doe #2 and Unknown Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sirleaf et al v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 3:2021cv00785
Plaintiff:
Theophilus Tari Agedah, Kwayee M. Tarty, Adhnanu Fahed Miri and others
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Seven Unknown Doe, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2021cv01382
Plaintiff:
Paul White
Defendant:
Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Seven Unknown DOE Agents of DHS/CDF/OASIS/Gloval Tel Link et al, Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Susana v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) et al
as 1:2021cv01272
Plaintiff:
Jose D. Susana
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement "ICE", Seven Unknown DOE Agentsof DHS/CDF/Oasis/Global Tel Link and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sirleaf v. Doe et al
as 3:2021cv00234
Defendant:
Unknown Doe, Jimmy Doe and Matiangai Arnett
Plaintiff:
Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Bryant et al
as 5:2017ct03173
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Griffin
Defendant:
Nadine J. Bryant, P.M. Mannion, A. Burgress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pew v. Simmons et al
as 3:2016cv00084
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Defendant:
Bruce Simmons and Unknown Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
