Cases 1 - 10 of 10,635
Fitzpatrick v. McKnight
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Brandon Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Daniel McKnight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Lovette
as 3:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Dallas Ford
Respondent:
Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Eldridge v. Antonelli
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
David Lee Eldridge
Defendant:
Bryan M. Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson-Brown v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00285
Petitioner:
LaTonya Richardson-Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lawson v. City of St Albans, WV et al
as 2:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Reginald Craig Lawson
Defendant:
City of St. Albans, WV, Kanawah County, WV and State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Collins v. Amjad et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Clayton Steven Collins
Defendant:
Dr. Ayne Amjad, Dr. James Beane, Carla Deem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smallwood v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Carl Smallwood
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Timothy Tibbs and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lott v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Darion D Lott
Respondent:
Warden Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fields v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jay James Fields
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stutler v. Tate
as 5:2024cv00103
Petitioner:
Aric Jason Stutler
Respondent:
Ditmaus Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
