Cases 1 - 10 of 10,657
Brown v. Farrell et al
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Brown
Defendant:
Paul T. Farrell, Tim Armstead, Elizabeth D. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hedrick v. Raliegh North Carolina P.D. et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Micheal Hedrick
Respondent:
Raliegh North Carolina P.D. et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nicholas v. White et al
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
James Lee Nicholas
Defendant:
Ron White and Josha Dowing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
LaDonna Jones
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rivera-Garcia v. Bayless
as 3:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
Christian Rivera-Garcia
Respondent:
Melissa Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Guthrie v. Cutwright
as 1:2024cv00307
Petitioner:
Traci Lynn Guthrie
Respondent:
Warden Cutwright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hollins v. FBOP et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Kevin Dale Hollins
Respondent:
FBOP, Mr. Suero, J. Siclari and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richison v. Chapman et al
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Richison
Defendant:
CO Aaron Chapman, CO Joel Hammer, CO Ashley Husk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutter v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Damien Rutter
Respondent:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello and Capt. Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanham v. Aramark Food Service Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Levi Lanham
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service Corporation, Anthony Booher, Correctional Officer Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
