Cases 11 - 20 of 67
Conte et al v. WakeMed
as 5:2021cv00190
Plaintiff:
Joanne Touchberry, Alexander Carlisle, Sarah Conte and others
Defendant:
WakeMed
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Heresniak v. Regency Management Services, LLC
as 1:2021cv00502
Defendant:
Regency Management Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sarah Heresniak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Wilson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 6:2020cv04308
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Sarah Wilson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
McKee v. MDO2 Fitness LLC
as 2:2020cv03227
Plaintiff:
Sarah McKee
Defendant:
MDO2 Fitness LLC doing business as O2 Fitness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH et al v. SHOE SHOW, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00813
Plaintiff:
SARAH SMITH, JEFFREY MORROW and MICHAEL CRISCO
Defendant:
SHOE SHOW, INC., BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SHOE SHOW RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN, LISA TUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Shriners Hospitals for Children v. The Paul F.M. Shaver, III, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan et al
as 2:2020cv00010
Plaintiff:
Shriners Hospitals for Children
Defendant:
Barrier Island Staton, Inc., Estate of Paul F.M. Shaver, III, Sugar Creek III, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Amaya v. SparkleClean, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00902
Plaintiff:
Yecenia Amaya
Defendant:
SparkleClean, LLC and Sarah Pelletier
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Mobley v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 7:2019cv00998
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Sarah A Mobley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
DICKEY v. R.R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY
as 1:2018cv00920
Plaintiff:
SARAH DICKEY
Defendant:
R.R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Brehm v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 0:2018cv02268
Plaintiff:
Sarah G Brehm
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
