Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Schmidt v. Charleston Collision Holdings Corp LLC et al
as 2:2014cv01094
Plaintiff:
Raymond H Schmidt
Defendant:
Charleston Collision Holdings Corp LLC, Charleston Collision LLC, Charleston Collision II LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Schmidt v. Bartech Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
Robert Schmidt
Defendant:
Bartech Group, Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Curtis v. Spacesaver Systems, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv02327
Plaintiff:
David Curtis
Defendant:
Spacesaver Systems, Inc. and Amy Schmidt Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pfieffer v. Schmidt Baking Company, Inc.
as 1:2011cv03307
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Pfieffer
Defendant:
Schmidt Baking Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 27 v. Schmidt Baking Company, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01140
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 27
Defendant:
Schmidt Baking Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Schmidt et al v. Group Medical Benefits Plan for Employees of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
as 3:2010cv02841
Plaintiff:
John Schmidt and John Doe
Defendant:
Group Medical Benefits Plan for Employees of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
James Cross v. Noel Bragg
as 08-1190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES CROSS, CHARLES CALKINS, EDWARD HUYLEBROECK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NOEL BRAGG and FLEET RESERVE ASSOCIATION PENSION PLAN
Defendant - None:
RICHARD B. SMITH, RALPH A. SCHMIDT, LAWRENCE J. BOUDREAUX and others
Cross v. Bragg
as 07-1699
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES CROSS, CHARLES CALKINS, EDWARD HUYLEBROECK and others
Defendant - Appellant:
NOEL BRAGG and FLEET RESERVE ASSOCIATION PENSION PLAN
Defendant:
RICHARD B. SMITH, RALPH A. SCHMIDT, LAWRENCE J. BOUDREAUX and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
