Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Baker v. American & Efird LLC
as 3:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jessica A. Baker
Defendant:
American & Efird LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Jones v. Baker et al
as 5:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
LaTreka Jones
Defendant:
Gerald M. Baker, Unknown Insurance Company and Jet Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Koval v. Raleigh Restaurant Concepts, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00423
Plaintiff:
Bethany Koval
Defendant:
Raleigh Restaurant Concepts, LLC d/b/a Mens Club of Raleigh, a North Carolina Limited Liability Company, Lowrie Management, LLLP, Sean Baker and others
Fortune v. Gaylor Electric, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00346
Plaintiff:
Darrell Jeffrey Fortune
Defendant:
Justin Baker and Gaylor Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BAKER et al v. BRANCH BANKING & TRUST CO., INC.
as 1:2014cv00967
Defendant:
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BAKER and R ANDREW KETNER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Hansen et al v. Wachovia Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv00262
Plaintiff:
Rose Hansen, Rose Hansen, Rose Hansen and others
Consol Plaintiff:
Michael Welch, Michael Welch, Michael Welch and others
Defendant:
Wachovia Corporation, Wachovia Corporation, Wachovia Corporation and others
Consol Defendant:
Peter C. Browning, John T. Casteen, III, Jerome A. Gitt and others
Movant:
Jason T. Willard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Baker et al
as 1:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Kenneth P Baker
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Adams et al v.The City of Raleigh, North Carolina
as 5:2007cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jerry nmi Adams, Jerry nmi Adams, Nebraska Baker and others
Defendant:
Raleigh, City of, N. C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
