Cases 111 - 120 of 188
Gilbert Spurlock v. Dana Hurst
as 09-1352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT L. SPURLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
DANA R. HURST, Colonel and U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Gilbert Spurlock v. Dana Hurst
as 09-1348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT L. SPURLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
DANA R. HURST, Colonel and U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2009cv00741
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, South Carolina Wildlife Federation, National Wildlife Federation and others
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Robert L Van Antwerp, Trey Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Spurlock v. Hurst et al
as 2:2009cv00253
Plaintiff:
Gilbert L. Spurlock
Defendant:
Dana R. Hurst and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Spurlock v. Hurst et al
as 2:2009cv00270
Plaintiff:
Gilbert L. Spurlock
Defendant:
Dana R. Hurst and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Spurlock v. Hurst et al
as 2:2009cv00261
Plaintiff:
Gilbert L. Spurlock
Defendant:
Dana R. Hurst and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Spurlock v. Hurst et al
as 2:2009cv00268
Plaintiff:
Gilbert L. Spurlock
Defendant:
Dana R. Hurst and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Spurlock v. Hurst et al
as 2:2009cv00266
Plaintiff:
Gilbert L Spurlock
Defendant:
Dana R. Hurst and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Spurlock v. Hurst et al
as 2:2009cv00257
Plaintiff:
Gilbert L. Spurlock
Defendant:
Dana R. Hurst and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Spurlock v. Hurst et al
as 2:2009cv00264
Plaintiff:
Gilbert L. Spurlock
Defendant:
Dana R. Hurst and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
