Cases 111 - 118 of 118
MICHAUX v. SECRETARY OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2009cv00141
Petitioner:
JAMES FRANKLIN MICHAUX
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Joseph v. The United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon et al
as 5:2008cv00523
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph
Defendant:
The United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and Agent Secretary of the Treasury Henry Merritt Paulson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008hc02088
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. Albemarle Electric Membership Corporation et al
as 5:2008cv00261
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel., WILLIAM G. ROSS, JR., SECRETARY, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL RESOURCES
Defendant:
Albermarle Electric Membership Corporation, Berkeley Electric Cooperative, Inc., Black River Electric Cooperative, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jones v. Department of the Navy, Dr. Donald C. Winter, Secretary
as 4:2007cv00165
Plaintiff:
Doctor B Jones
Defendant:
Department of the Navy, Dr. Donald C. Winter, Secretary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2007cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
LU v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2007cv00057
Plaintiff:
JUN LU
Defendant:
Secretary MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, DONALD NEUFELD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
