Cases 11 - 20 of 88
TL Management LLC v. Chestnut Hill Mental Health Center Inc
as 6:2022cv01383
Plaintiff:
TL Management LLC
Defendant:
Chestnut Hill Mental Health Center Inc doing business as SpringBrook Behavioral Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Chestnut v. Rhodes
as 1:2022cv01344
Petitioner:
Raymond Chestnut
Respondent:
Director Marcus Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Chestnut v. Rhodes
as 1:2022cv00837
Petitioner:
Raymond Chestnut, Raymond Edward Chestnut and Ray Chestnut
Respondent:
Marcus Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Chestnut v. Rhodes
as 1:2022cv00678
Petitioner:
Raymond Chestnut
Respondent:
Marcus Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Chestnut v. Hollywood
as 1:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
Raymond Chestnut
Defendant:
Officer Hollywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Chestnut v. Rhodes
as 1:2022cv00235
Petitioner:
Raymond Chestnut, Raymond Edward Chestnut, Ray and others
Respondent:
Marcus Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Chestnut v. Trident Health (Medical) Center C.E.O. et al
as 9:2021cv03875
Plaintiff:
Craig Latwain Chestnut
Defendant:
Trident Health (Medical) Center C.E.O., Nurse Kirstin Sutton, Jennifer R Bottoms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chestnut v. USA
as 4:2021cv03762
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Chestnut
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chestnut v. Rhodes
as 1:2021cv03766
Petitioner:
Raymond Chestnut
Respondent:
Director Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chestnut v. South Carolina Department of Correctional Institution Medical et al
as 9:2021cv02018
Plaintiff:
Craig Latwain Chestnut
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Correctional Institution Medical and Trenton Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
