Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00061
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018hc02069
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4248
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CROSBY v. OMEGA FLEX, INC.
as 1:2016cv00148
Defendant:
OMEGA FLEX, INC.
Plaintiff:
JAMES CROSBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Young et al v. AGCO Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00054
Defendant:
FMC Corporation, Genuine Parts Company doing business as National Automotive Parts Association also known as NAPA, Georgia-Pacific LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn M. Young and Sara Workman
Cross Defendant:
Crane Environmental, Inc., William Powell Company and Genuine Parts Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
McSwain v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al
as 1:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
Minerva McSwain
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Airgas USA, LLC, Aurora Pump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EFFINGER ET AL., V. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00448
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. EFFINGER and NANCY EFFINGER
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, ALFA LAVAL, INC., ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. NCDPS et al
as 1:2015cv00234
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEWIS JONES
Defendant:
NCDPS, FRANK L. PERRY, LYNN C. SUMMERS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
