Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Audio MPEG, Inc. et al v. Dell, Inc., et al
as 2:2015cv00073
Defendant:
Dell, Inc
Plaintiff:
Audio MPEG, Inc, U.S. Philips Corporation, TDF SAS and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
HP Inc. and Dell, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Societa Italiana per lo Sviluppo deli'Elettronica S.p.A. and Sisvel US
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 281
TAY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv00802
Plaintiff:
TAY
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, MARISSA PISARICK, RANDOLPH NAOMI and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MLR, LLC v. Dell Inc.
as 1:2014cv00135
Plaintiff:
MLR, LLC
Defendant:
Dell Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Dell Inc. v. Germain
as 5:2011cv00584
Plaintiff:
Dell Inc.
Defendant:
Gregory A. Germain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
01 Communique Laboratory, Inc. v. Logmein, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01007
Plaintiff:
01 Communique Laboratory, Inc.
Defendant:
Logmein, Inc. and Dell, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 281 Patent Infringement
Acqis, LLC v. Apro International, Inc. et al
as 1:2010mc00049
Plaintiff:
Acqis, LLC
Defendant:
Apro International, Inc., Clearcube Technology, Inc., Dell Inc. and others
Movant:
David J. Kappos
Dell Inc. v. Kappos et al
as 1:2009cv00918
Plaintiff:
Dell Inc. and Dell Inc.
Defendant:
David J. Kappos and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SPH America, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00740
Plaintiff:
SPH America, LLC
Defendant:
Acer, Inc., Acer America California, Amazon.Com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Advanced Internet Technologies, Inc. v. Dell, Inc.
as 5:2007cv00426
Plaintiff:
Advanced Internet Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Dell, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
